leica m240 vs m262 image qualitywhat happened to mark reilly strong island
It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! With ACR, my standard daylight setting for the M240 is 5300/10, while with the M262, it is 5000/0, both with embedded profile. without having to transfer the images to the computer first. Ive had it for years and purchased it when M8s were at their lowest prices. Hi Hamish, I have used an M240 extensively for the last 18 months. Yura, I still use both with other M along. It has been a bit of an adjustment shooting with such a stripped-down camera but Im really learning to love it a lot. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. Its user interface is simple, uncluttered and largely very logical. As John said it beforeendless upgrades, hours to spend to edit files, digital, you take even more picturesthe iso dial is nice, but I prefer (for the sake of creativity versus being too convenient) Film and stick to my a la carte M7 with one lensecalms down your mind. I upgraded to the M240 from an M9, had it for 3 months and went back to an M9. Why torture yourself? Good thing, I don't need to upgrade further, as those are plenty enough for many years to come. Usability is great (with some of the limitations you mentioned), and image quality of the 262 is certainly superb, and the main reason (aside from usability and a good sensor), at least for me, the Leica M glass, is a topic somebody else can cover much better than I can. Unfortunately, there are elements of the way the ISO modes work that have slightly bothered me.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2','ezslot_13',184,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-leaderboard-2-0'); To be fair, the auto ISO is really well implemented. Congratulations on your decision. By comparison, the Leica M240 had a lot of features many of which, as Ive alluded to, were seen by some as not needed on a Leica M rangefinder. The menu is cut and dry. May be different sensor calibration? Weight is certainly a thing though! Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. I have preview turned off too and use it like I do my M6. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. Is the 262 different in this regard? Here are my thoughts on the M240 alongside my second hand and limited knowledge of the M10. Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. Then along comes the M262, digital Leica I'd been waiting for. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! It does take lovely photos however and I dont mind using I most of the time but. You and Roger Hicks. I love the files the camera produces, the size and weight is just right and operationally it couldnt be much simpler. Oddly though, handling the Leica M262 there is the slightest sense that somethings missing when comparing it to its fuller-featured sibling, the M240. True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. I appreciate your thoughts on the 262 v the 240 as I am thinking about setting an MD body. Personally, I tire of the constant whining about Leica prices. Without even thinking about it, I started using the live-view. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. So, the obvious question: why not the M10-D? The Leica M-D Typ 262 was released in 2016 and is already rather difficult to find. The settings I use (format and manual or auto lens designation) pop up first on the main menu and with 2 clicks both actions are completed. The body is pretty well weather sealed. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. "MM-P""" Leica M Typ240MM-P Typ240 The view taken by some Leica users when the M240 was released was that features like live-view and video had no place on a Leica. Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. Id probably buy a new car. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. All of a sudden, the M10 held a lot of appeal. Another M10 fetish is better performance at high ISO. A few years later I sold all my Nikon DLSR kit and switched to Sony full frame A7 cameras and began to realise just how useful it can be. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. As I said at the end of that post, I then found myself in with a big chuck of the dreaded GAS. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. With some apprehension, I took the memory card out of the camera and put it into the computer. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. I am aware many own the Monochrom and love it to death. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. Finally, a digital camera that truly feels like a good old analog Leica. Hmm I wonder if you might be right there. For the M240, forget it. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. One of the advantages of live-view is the same as one of the advantages of rangefinder cameras they both allow you to observe the world outside of the frame. One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. I cant tell you how relieved I was about this I know that probably sounds daft, but my Leica rangefinders are default cameras that I rely on when I want to shoot without any thought to the camera. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. - 35mmc, https://matthewtrader.com/leica-m262-review-after-photographing-my-nieces-5th-birthday-party, Nikon 28ti and 35ti - Mini-Review - By Ahmed Al Shorouqi, 5 frames with the Nikon FM2 & Agfa APX 400 in my Paris - By Martina Rigotti, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews. No one ever uses video functionality of the240 anyways. And thats pushing it. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. Here is a quickreview and comparison for the Leica M Typ 262 vs M Typ 240 rangefinder cameras. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Last thursday I thought for a few moments about selling my complete gear because of the new Q2, but then I thought about my beloved Summicron 90 from 1973 and my Tele Elmar 135 from 1963 and my Summilux 50 from 2017 and then I said to me: No!, I cannot sell them, I am not a fan of 28 mm.The only tiny shortcoming is for me the limitation of the maximum shutter speed (60 sec) and sometimes I miss an autofocus. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! In my view the lens in use IS much more important than a bit colour differences M240/M262/other Ms. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. Manage Settings As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. Sadly, that is the way of digital cameras my friend, a never-ending hamster wheel of upgrades. The thing is, I much prefer the warm display on the M262. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. Didnt have the budget to stretch to a Summilux/Summicron/ Summarit. Leica M9 vs. M240; M240: More Thoughts; Leica M240: Final Verdict; Leica M9 sharpness vs. Sony RX1R, Nikon D800E, Fuji X100s; My camera of the year for 2013; Related. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. In reality, Ive been saving for this m10 for a long time. what a great text, and great pictures, thank you! Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. I have looked into all three cameras and all seem like perfectly great cameras . I cant. He mentioned that he drives older vehicles in order to be able to afford just the kit he wants.Agreed with John Smith. I shouldve read the manual! Image quality will be essentially the same. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Nice review.I bought a m262 this year when one of my pensions surprisingly came out.I wanted1] a digital leica m2] no video3] no live view4] no EVFBut i like to sometimes review a pic when i am out and about.The 262 is perfect for me and i love it.with the m-e 240 being announced i have noticed that used 262 cameras have already dropped in price so its possible i can buy a dream 2nd body.Meaning another 262. From what I understand the M10 has substantially improved this feature and this is an attractive change. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. Some cards are woefully slow. Paste as plain text instead, This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. But nope, they included a hardly useful flourish, that as you say, looks like it was thought up but a marketing department. This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. The sensor is not the same, by the way. Im not going to go into details here to be honest. For example, I have seen an as new M240 from a Leica Store for 2,495 and a Voigtlander Ultron 50mm for c.700. Im not loaded, but I do focus almost all my disposable income on this. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. Menu. If tapping the top plate sounded a bit hollow: remember its aluminium not brass in the 262, Sure. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. As I mentioned in my recent post about the M240, the stripped-back interface was exactly reason . With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a flash. It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. If you arent aware of these lenses, they focus down to about 40cm. By Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. Equally, Ive not found the dynamic range to be too limited. In short, I generally find myself not needing to tweak the colours at all from the M262, which is something I quite appreciate. Now, that update costs thousands of dollars. I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. But, when my M262 needed to go to German camera hospital for what I guessed might be a significant amount of time (as is often the case), I figured I had little to loose trying out an M240 for a few weeks/months. Heres some photos: Bear in mind, these have been taken with a load of different lenses:if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-leader-3','ezslot_21',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-3-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-leader-2','ezslot_20',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-leader-2-0'); In conclusion, the Leica M262 is a fantastic camera with a great interface with very few issues worth picking holes in. I'm looking into both as well and leaning towards the 262 because I have no use for video with this purchase and I love the shutter. Basically, Im sold on live-view these days but, despite this fact, I didnt think it would appeal to me on a Leica. Now, if the shutter was fully mechanical and cocked by hand that would be a very different thing. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. As the cameras are meant to have identical sensors, do we think this is just new owner's biased impressions (nothing wrong with that btw) is could there be something in this? I took the M240 because it offeres live view. The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. The Leica M [typ 240] (or M240 for short) was the first Leica to adopt the odd naming convention that broke away from the M# convention of yore. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? Leica has issued new, updated firmware for the entire range of Leica M10 and M240-generation cameras. My first surprise was as any Leica M240 user would likely tell you just how familiar it felt. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. I was once very happy with my M9. Find out more about 35mmc here. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. This happens with the M240 from time to time. I love the M240, didn't feel to switch to the M10. I turned off automatic review and theres no chimping, and with an ISO dial I dont even need to use any buttons throughout a shoot. Fortunately, when the image popped up in Lightroom, it was fine or at least it was little different to a photo that I might have expected out of the M262. Upload or insert images from URL. The M240 feels, well, fuller. ), and Im now looking to part with the Leica M240 and put the money back into my business (where I borrowed it from). The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. Or pictures are completely similar? And thats pushing it. The better screen, slightly improved interface and even fairly small things like the artificially lit frame lines introduced in the M240 made the the camera feel more mature. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. by Charles Higham, https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/, A Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 ZM Distagon Review - An Optical Wonder! So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. Aluminium body makes is nice and light. You can post now and register later. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. Hi everyone. Thankfully with the M10 they've returned to the old system. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. A week or so later I was on a shoot for work. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. I did find a custom LR preset that helps a lot, but it would be nice to have natural skin tones straight from the camera. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. On the M240 its easy to change ISO by simply pressing the dedicated ISO button and turning the thumb adjustment wheel.The EVF. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. Using the zoom focus button on the front of the camera along with Live View is a good aid to focus in these situations.Ergonomics. Yes!! Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. Focusing that close without rangefinder coupling is of course quite difficult unless you have live-view. Your link has been automatically embedded. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. I have gotten perfectly good images with the M-240 at ISO 2000 and at 3200 the images are still manageable with a small amount of noise reduction in LR. Damn digital cameras I can control film camera GAS quite well these days, but these digital buggers still get me! Just experimenting, I took a bunch of photos of my mates Canon AE1 this was fun with a rangefinder; I could get used to this! I am sure you have seen the funny Video of Kai Wong:https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Wong+Laica+M+262, I have indeed, thanks, I shall take another look its been a while!Sounds like youve made a good choice!I have recently picked up a TL to use along side the forthcoming M10 they both use the same Visoflex, Im going to take the charitable route here but Pera Detlics comment may be interpreted as Leicas are expensive and Pera doesnt have the matching skill set to justify buying one.I also feel that way. I do use this feature fairly often as an alternative to using a screw in BW filter. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Ill have to dig out an online manual , I got an 262 you have to press SET after choosing- only with 3 button possiblewith latest software (2021). All images generated with the M262 + 24mm 3.8 were taken July 6 between 3 and 5 PM around Victoria, BC in direct overhead sunlight (far from ideal), https://www.dropbox.com/sh/borvrgwfsovpoiz/AADvQ-IsxTfl51btqaCD_i4Fa?dl=0. The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. These were live-view using the screen on the back or a slot in electronic viewfinder and video. Ha!Have you ever read my Fuji X100f review I think you might enjoy it.https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/. At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! Shooting with the Leica M262 in manual ISO takes 3 commands to change and set the ISO. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. I remember when live-view first started appearing on interchangeable lens digital cameras. The price is$5195/4050. This includes the M10-R, M10-P, M10 Monochrom, M10, and M10-D from the current generation, as well as the M (Typ 240), M-P (Typ 240), M (Typ 262), M-D (Typ 262) and the M Monochrom (Typ 246) from the prior generation. Ultra-niche appeal. Nice write-up. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). The obvious take-away from the third image set is just how poorly the Leica M246 and Leica M Monochrom renders overexposed highlights. Changing from color to black and white takes a lot of menu meandering and I wish there was a way to place this setting into a favorites menu as in the M10 (I think). Compared to the M9 Ive found less of a problem with magenta shift, especially in skin tones, though its fair to say the bias is still toward magenta as opposed the the green bias I found in my Sonys especially the older and cheapest ones that had frankly horrible colour-science. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. . With 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. I am seeing a few posts by M262 / M-D owners stating that there is slightly improved image quality and even less banding at higher ISOs on the M262 series cameras. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. After the M11 released though, used prices of the M10 dropped and I decided to get one. Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. I use along the two M240/262/etc. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. Either way, its the M262 that I want to keepif(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[250,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_18',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); Though I must admit, this experience has had me thinking that an M10 would be better suited to me now. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. I keep looking at the 262 as a hidden gem. I really enjoyed the m60 when I shot it a few years back, but for practical day-to-day photography, I think a screen suits my digital shooting desires better.And besides, the little flip out thumb-rest?! It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. I remember having an unexpected opportunity to fondle the M10, when it was first promoted, when a Leica rep. happened to visit my favorite camera shop. Got a spare lottery ticket? The M10 is also very slightly lighter than the M240. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. Youve often been a voice of reason in my ear on this website, John. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. https://www.dailycameranews.com/, ShakeSphere Portable Blender E-Lid review, Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 Review: A Solid but Unremarkable Upgrade. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. . Epson RD1 style I loved my RD1! When I was looking at replacing my M9 with a newer model which I did in large part for the benefit of a better screen on the back I chose to skip the Leica M240 due to the fact that I didnt feel like the swathe of features it had compared to the later M262 offered me any advantage.
Are Torrington Schools Closed Tomorrow,
Things To Do In Florence, Sc This Weekend,
Dr Lutchmedial Cause Of Death,
Articles L
